The Medicare legislation is not clear in relation to rebates for medically necessary IVF. It states that if you are in an agreement to do surrogacy, you are not eligible for surrogacy. (Clause 2.37.7)
However, what if you are NOT in an agreement – say, you haven’t found a surrogate yet? Or you have just had a hysterectomy or you have just survived cancer and now you want to preserve your eggs so you have a chance of having a family?
If you are not in an agreement, and are not subject to an agreement – technically, you should be able to do an IVF cycle and be treated just like any other couple.
Medicare recently replied to one of our campaigners and stated that ‘because a birth would require an ‘intended’ surrogacy’ they could not provide a rebate. However, this is clearly an interpretation of the law, and is not what the law expresses in the legislation.
Medicare state that they are committed to health services and ‘are currently looking into changes but they are NOT expected in the short term.’
This is why we are here campaigning. Now the law is being interpreted rather than expressly clarified – and it is open to interpretation at the clinic too.
Clinics are left to interpret the law, and as we have seen in the ICSI debate in an earlier posting, it means that even when surrogacy candidates are allowed to have a Medicare rebate, clinics will err on the side of NOT giving them.
We would like to clear up this mess. We would like to see IVF rebates provided equally to women who have a uterus or those who do not. Equal treatment under the law is a basic tenant of our society and we want to change the Medicare laws to reflect that.
We hope to have your support by either downloading the Petition in the files section and/or writing to your local member of parliarment and Tanya Plibersek.